Search for: "Allergan Holdings, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2013, 7:23 am by Kristin Barlett
., holding that a derivative suit against Botox-maker Allergan, Inc. should be dismissed because Allergan had already secured a judgment in its favor in a nearly identical suit in California. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:20 am
In a resounding victory, Botox manufacturer Allergan, Inc. has secured a permanent injunction from a  California federal court forbidding competitors Merz Pharmaceuticals and Merz Aesthetic from rolling out the sale of Xeomin for cosmetic purposes for the next ten months. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Irwin, 601 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2010) governs this case. (...)We agree with Allergan and hold that the FDCA does not impliedly preempt its UCL claim. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:06 am by Andrew Russell
The Court agreed with Allergan, holding that Allergan has not waived the attorney-client privilege with respect to the documents at issue. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:13 pm
The makers of Botox, Allergan Inc., recently filed a lawsuit against the FDA. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 9:31 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  The defendants included Johnson & Johnson, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Endo International and AbbVie Inc. [read post]
29 May 2011, 12:01 pm
Finally, because we hold that Allergan's pleadings meet the standing requirements of section 17204, we need not reach the issue of whether it plead an injury that could be compensated by restitution. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm by Javier Dominguez
Their petitions had effectively been in a holding pattern awaiting the high court’s decision. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:12 pm
Teleflex, Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 421 (2007). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The LAP-BAND is marketed by Allergan Inc., based in Goleta, Calif. [read post]